Jump to content

Talk:Church of St. Polyeuctus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleChurch of St. Polyeuctus has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 19, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 6th-century Church of St. Polyeuctus (remains pictured) in Constantinople was deliberately planned to imitate the Temple of Solomon?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Church of St. Polyeuctus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
    The WP:lead is quite short, but is just about acceptable.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I'm going to pass the article as it currently stands. There is some scope for improvement, an expanded WP:lead is possibly the first item that could be addressed; however the article is of sufficient quality to be awarded GA-status. So, congratulations on the quality of the article.Pyrotec (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]