Talk:Cincinnati Subway

United States: Ohio / Cincinnati Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	June 28, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Casadae3, Mpmohan1. Peer reviewers: Casadae3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

According to [1] it was "built for standard high platform subway cars and interurbans". But from what I can make out from the photos on [2], the interurban cars had street-level entrances. How would this have worked? --NE2 06:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the part about the missing persons should be deleted. I can't find any source of that info anywhere. hawkfrost18 (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - I've removed it, as even the name (Professor Donald Brinkermeyer) is a GoogleWhack. pbones (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Largest abandoned subway?

Are you sure? The source is a youtube video. The Rochester subway also lays abandoned yet it has 23 stations compared to Cincinnati's 3. Sub! 17:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I looked at the link, it's on Youtube but its a credible new broadcast. I don't know much about Rochester, how long is the subway system? Cincy's is a little over 2 miles long. Also looking at the Wikipedia article for Rochester's it looks like the city is filling in the subway so that would make it not a tunnel- I.e Cincy still has an unfilled tunnel. If we can get any other sources that provide more specific data that would be useful. Bhockey10 (talk) 21:24, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, that's it's on YouTube doesn't matter at all. It's a professional news broadcast (WLWT), not some kid rambling to a webcam in their dorm room. J.H (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Must complete

It is never too late to complete this subway. It will transform the city. Only 2 miles long? The city of Liverpool in England has about 5 miles of abandoned tunnels under its streets - some are mothballed for later use. Stations can be cut into them. Subways/light rail are eco and create vibrant communities.188.222.174.87 (talk) 10:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article ranking

This article is at least class C, so I am upgrading it from Start class. Andrew³²⁷ 13:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gauge

Broad Gauge is any gauge wider than 4ft 8.5in. This article should be more specific on which gauge it is. Is it Russian Gauge? Brunel Gauge? Pennsylvania Gauge? Broad Gauge isn't specific enough. 15:39, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Dr. British12 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cincinnati Subway. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/transeng/pages/-7185-/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cincinnati Subway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430170135/http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/transeng/pages/-7185-/ to http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/transeng/pages/-7185-/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cincinnati Subway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708105925/http://www.building-cincinnati.com/2008/09/study-one-of-three-options-for-subway.html to http://www.building-cincinnati.com/2008/09/study-one-of-three-options-for-subway.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cincinnati Subway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524084219/http://www.wlwt.com/news/14790068/detail.html to http://www.wlwt.com/news/14790068/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper wrote against the subway

You find in the article the sentence "Newspapers started to print articles arguing against the subway, using such rationales as the tight curve of the subway and its small tunnels to try to advocate against its completion." But I don't find any source for that. In the German Wikipedia we are arguing if the subway was also stopped because of the mass motorization and sayings against the subway. Can you help me?--Leiflive (talk) 06:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cinci Subway Edits

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I'm going to be contributing to the Cincinnati Subway article. I will be adding more photos, greater detail, more proposed uses, and a more accurate description of the inside and layout of the underground tunnel. I will also be discussing in greater depth the lengths that the subway has become a popular location for street artists and graffiti writers. (Casadae3 (talk) 05:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC))

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I'm going to be adding all of my resources to the talk page after I post all of my edits. (Casadae3 (talk) 09:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC))

Edits I want to Make

This article fails to go into much detail regarding the proposition of the subway system and I want to cover more into that. I also would like to add bits and pieces to sections that I feel really don't cover the entire depth of the issues that arose from the subway system such as the construction and failure section and the attempts at revival section. I will also add in how the public felt as a reaction to the subway system. (Mpmohan1 (talk) 01:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Another Video

Should we include an external link to the excellent 29-minute video from The Proper People which takes the viewer through the entire underground length of this subway? (America's Largest Abandoned Subway - Cincinnati Subway Explored!) Radec (talk) 01:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]