Talk:Colonna family

Do the Colonna still exist? john k 17:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC) Yes, the Colonna still exist. They are still the owners of the Palace. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.65.197.164 (talk) 20:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prösels Castle

My weird edit summary here should have read: ‘Restore link to Prösels Castle. Its owners claimed, at least, membership of the Colonna ~~castle~~ family, and their coat of arms depicted in that article includes the Colonna column.’ Sorry to have confused. Ian Spackman (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Colonna family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Refs for current status section

The ref for The History of the Popes: Their Church and State (Volume III) by Leopold von Ranke (Wellesley College Library, reprint; 2009) needs a full citation. The archive.org link is dead, and no Wellesley College Library 2009 edition seems to be available through Google Books. The original edition was published in 1870, and a search in this version found nothing for "Colonna di Stigliano". The mention of Colonna is from the time of Pope Clement VIII, and thus says nothing about the current descendants. Page 213 in Papal Genealogy: The Families and Descendants of the Popes looks more helpful. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 23:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 04:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Colonna family → Colonna – No need for disambiguation, there is only a redirect Gryffindor (talk) 23:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, would more likely move Colonna (disambiguation) to baseline. Colonna as a mononym would be Vittoria Colonna In ictu oculi (talk) 18:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- What a mess. Colonna (surname) also. Most of whom not part of family? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per iio. Dicklyon (talk) 07:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, by the principle of least astonishment it should surely be here or at House of Colonna (for example, see House of Medici, Orsini family, or House of Sforza, to name but three quick examples); happy days, Lindsay^Hello 12:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.