Talk:Command HQ

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Patched version

According to [1] and [2], someone bought the rights to this game around 1999 and started selling a patched PC version that "updated the colors and fixed that annoying unit production glitch." Anyone know more about this? 134.117.137.69 (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon review

I just look at the article and the review clearly state that this is a fun, easy to learn, strategic global conquest game designed by Ozark Software. Unfortunately it has one fatal flaw: its copy protection. This refers to a problem with the copy protection present in very early retail version of the game. This bug was fixed more than 23 years ago and is no longer present in the game. Actually copy protection is no longer part of the game at all (version 1.97 and above).

I don't think that this bug should be held against an otherwise great game. I would like to recommend that we at least mention that in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giavin01 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Dragon review was essentially a recommendation, but complained about a bug.

A call to MicroPlays support line con-firmed that users might need to go through the copy protection ten to fifteen times before getting into the game.

...this was later fixed (I think). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.160.79 (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Command HQ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source

https://archive.org/details/assorted-game-players-pc-strategy-guide/Game%20Players%20PC%20Strategy%20Guide%20Volume%204%20Number%202%20%28March-April%201991%29/page/54/mode/2up