Talk:Copenhagen Airport railway station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Copenhagen Airport railway station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Two stations or one?

The article tries to described a single station named "Lufthavnen", which is serviced by the metro as well as mainline trains. This does not quite match reality. Most conspicuously, the mainline station is named "Københavns Lufthavn, Kastrup" (though the comma sometimes is missing) in everything from timetables to platform signage.

It would be most correct, in my opinion, to say that there are two rail stations in the vicinity of Copenhagen Airport:

A mainline station "Københavns Lufthavn Kastrup", directly below Terminal 3.
A metro station "Lufthavnen", accessible by stairs and a walkway from the landside end of Terminal 3.

However, it would be confusing for readers who are not prepared to make such fine distinctions if we had two different articles. I think, therefore (but am prepared to be convinced otherwise) that we should have a single article that describes both stations, but describes them as being distinct, in different sections and with separate s-rail tables. Then Københavns Lufthavn, Kastrup Station and Københavns Lufthavn Kastrup Station should redirect here, and be used in succession links at København H. –Henning Makholm 02:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This seems a reasonable approach to me. David Arthur (talk) 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions

Hi, I have added description of the more detailed location of the 2 stations in the airport, and the 3rd which has the same name as the airport - but is not at the airport. Hope it is clear...

About the table in the bottom I have a problem. There is no traffic on the "CphRos" system, and actually there never as been any traffic on this system which involved both Copenhagen Central (KH) and the airport (CPH). Only "KH to Roskilde" or "CPH to Roskilde" (bypassing KH). This line should be deleted but I can't manage...

Finally about the R40 system. There are now two systems, one the old R40 running Elsinore-KH-airport-Malmö and beyond. Another later system runs now between Nivå (south of Elsinore, also served by R40) to KH, to the airport and sometimes to Malmö South.

--Honymand (talk) 11:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think I got it right now --Honymand (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copenhagen Airport, Kastrup Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110204010/http://www.m.dk/etape3 to http://www.m.dk/etape3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]