Talk:Cutie Q

Cutie Q has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 9, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Melee (game terminology) (0 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cutie Q/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 20:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll start reviewing this article. I'll let you know the results in a couple of days.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

@Namcokid47: Is there more than one source you can use for the gameplay?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have a Japanese copy of Namco Museum Vol. 2 which includes the game, I might be able to use that. Namcokid47 (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Namcokid47: You can also use reviews that are already in the article to supplement the sources too.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Namcokid47: Thank you for adding an additional source for the gameplay. The reception section is a little lacking as before but I added some sources that can be used to help establish it. Luckily there are reviews out there for Namco Museum Vol.2 and if there's any commentary on the game, it can be used in the article too. I won't hold it against the GA to add them or not, but it will help to make this a stronger article. I believe this is good enough to pass.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 02:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]