Talk:Death of Ayakannu Marithamuthu

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Reliability of Makansutra as a source

Much of this article, including the major salient claims, are sourced to an article on something called "Makansutra." The link comes from yahoo! entertainment, which already gives me pause. A bit of searching shows Makansutra to be a "food culture" blog. I don't think we should be sourcing murder allegations here.

I have tried to use the Straits Times to verify some of these claims. I certainly can verify the existence of the "curry murder," and I found the 2003 article for the priest's statement. But I can't get the 1987 articles on Lexis for some reason.

For now, I'm going to remove the extraordinary claims sourced to Makansutra. To reinstate, I'd expect to find sourcing that addresses EXACTLY who said that the victim was chopped up into curry. For now, all we have is Makansutra saying that one of the accused finally opened up and revealed the information... as well as a helpful picture of a fish head illustrating what the curry could have looked like. I don't think that's appropriate for an encyclopedic treatment.Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 00:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this article is currently proposed as a DYK - asserting as fact the 'curry' claim, and in consequence grossly violating WP:BLP policy. I've raised the matter at WP:ANI: [1] AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:54, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's likely that this was used as a source. It contains links to Flickr images of press clippings, including the 27 March 1987 article, the 6 May 1995 article, and the 24 August 2003 sidebar, all supposedly from The Straits Times. Mind matrix 21:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The public library is just a five minute walk from my humble abode, where I can view all archived newspapers at its multimedia station at my leisure. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 05:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We can't cite images of clippings uploaded to Flickr as a source - in fact you probably shouldn't even be linking them, since they are likely copyright violations. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say we should; I said "It's likely that this was used as a source". These are likely the articles though, and I provided the links for informational purposes only. Mind matrix 21:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to this, information about the alleged murder can be found in True Crimes of Singapore (Volume 1) by Pugalenthii, published by VJ Times in 2000 (ISBN 9812211659). I haven't find a copy online. Mind matrix 21:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note to people looking for sources - I've found that sources vary between Ayakannu and Ayakanno. When searching on Google Books, "Ayakannu Marithamuthu" gave me nothing relevant, but "Ayakanno" did. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 03:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most news sources, including The Straits Times maintain his name as Ayakanno. His death certificate states the same too. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 05:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page moved

I have moved this page from "murder of foo" to "death of foo" per WP:BLPCRIME. Nobody was convicted for murder, so we should adhere to that. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been a formal declation of death? Kablammo (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The disappearance occurred in '84 so it is well past the time that a legal presumption of death could have been made. But the sources are all very focused on the salacious aspects and have gone on the assumption of presumed murder- not on actual facts and I have not seen that aspect of "declared dead" addressed. It would be very ironic if he suddenly turned up alive "What me murdered? No, I just couldnt stand to live in Singapore any longer and went back home to India."-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does a formal determination need to be made (i.e., issuance of a death certificate) under Singapore law? If so, has it been made? And if not, or if we don't know, should we (Wikipedia) presume death, or continue to apply BLP (as regards the subject of this article) until some determination of death has been made? Those seem to be the issues.

I think we should not assume the person is deceased until determined to be so, and we should apply BLP. Kablammo (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

in the section above Bonkers makes a reference to a death certificate. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I had not seen that. If a reliable source says a death certificate has been issued or otherwise confirms death we can rely on that; without a reliable source we are bound by WP:BDP. Kablammo (talk) 17:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potential source

If someone has access to old copies of Asiaweek, [2] this looks like it has some non-sensationalist coverage. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Death of Ayakannu Marithamuthu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150104164706/http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Crime/Story/A1Story20120403-337375.html to http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne+News/Crime/Story/A1Story20120403-337375.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]