This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Nobody is entitled to select works to be listed and exclude others
I don't understand why DrThneed feels s/he is entitled to select articles and insist that the section be titled "Selected works." Wikipedia doesn't have a selection committee. Toddst1 (talk) 01:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I included a list of some of her works as that is useful to the reader. Clearly a complete list would be overkill. In the absence of a community-agreed guideline about lists of publications on academic papers, I used my own commonsense as an editor to select her most highly cited work and other papers that seemed important. I don't object to you retitling the list as "Partial list of works" but that really seems to be splitting hairs to me, the list is the same and somebody had to select it!
I also note that you placed a potential conflict of interest flag on my talk page in relation to this page. I have answered on the talk page, but I find it offensive that you are accusing me of having an undeclared conflict of interest, which I do not. DrThneed (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now it's a "partial list" containing the selected works. They are still selected, as outlined above, and the header is therefore slightly less accurate. But maybe that's a price worth paying if it ends this silly discussion. K. Oblique02:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Selected publications" or "Selected research" is a common heading in articles about academics. I've used it many times. In lieu of any WP:WPBIO guidelines about which (of a very long list) of publications should be selected, the editor chooses them: usually the most cited or influential. Just as the editor selects which of the many facts about a person's life are worth including in the article. Important publications need to be mentioned, but Wikipedia is not the place for a complete publications listing. Hence a selection. If you disagree about which particular works should be listed, discuss it on this talk page. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 02:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Toddst1, as others have said, this is a very common and uncontroversial approach. 'Selected' in this instance just means "a selection", it doesn't imply that Wikipedia has somehow denoted these works as being the best works of the article subject. In case it is helpful, here are some featured articles that use sections titled 'Selected works':
...these were all just random examples from taking 2 minutes to look at the list of featured articles. I'm sure there are others. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:41, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Toddst1: If you don't find it helpful to see that *featured* articles also take the "Selected works" approach, then that's fine. Giantflightlessbirds has a good suggestion to deal with any substantive concerns about the works that have been selected; i.e. discuss on this talk page where you disagree. Chocmilk03 (talk) 18:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
