Talk:Delsworth Buckingham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:45, 11 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • ... new enough, long enough, no copyvio issues, hook is interesting and clearly in article with a following citation to a reference stating the hook fact. QPQ to be provided. Hook appears okay for last slot or 1 April. Please ping me when QPQ done. Thank you. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source[edit]

What makes the "Strangest Names in American Political History" blog reliable? Mucube (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • WP:BLOG says that Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. – It appears that the author of the blog is, oddly, a "subject-matter expert" in weird political names – blog articles by him have been cited by several reliable publications, such as Washington.edu, UConn.edu, Richmond.edu, the Pennsylvania General Assembly website, and others. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I would cite the newspapers directly, instead of using the blog because the information there seems to be taken from the newspaper articles that you cite in the article already. Mucube (talk) 22:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]