Jump to content

Talk:Denise Welch

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former partner

[edit]

Who is Denise Welch's ex-partner that she often refers to? Is he a celebrity as well? 80.47.45.247 15:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The actor David Easter, who played Pat Hancock in Brookside and Pete Callan in Family Affairs. Smurfmeister (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Denise welch cs.jpg

[edit]

Image:Denise welch cs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at [[Wikipedi

Image

[edit]

The previous image MAY be a copyvio - until it is determined to be a copyvio by Commons, why can't it stay here? Either that or no image at all if a free one isn't available. The current one is beyond horrid. Lhb1239 (talk) 17:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The picture isn't great. Lots of articles have pictures that aren't great. We work with what's freely available. I don't see any reason to wait for commons to get around to deleting what almost certainly has bad licensing information. --Onorem♠Dil 18:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No.....we work with (and provide) that which is encyclopedic. I don't see how such an uncomplementary photo adds encyclopedic value to the article at all. Lhb1239 (talk) 18:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I notice the commons image has now been deleted. I won't restore the other without consensus, but would argue that a photo adds value by showing what the subject looks like. No, it's not a promo headshot for the subject, but it is a version of what they look like. --Onorem♠Dil 02:31, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If it shows the subject of the article in less-than-optimal/complimentary circumstances, then it detracts more than it adds. If it detracts rather than attracts it doesn't add to the quality of the article and shouldn't be included. There's GOT to be a better free image available out there somewhere. Lhb1239 (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i say if a free picture is available, use that until something better comes along.GunGagdinMoan 22:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is something you and I differ on. I think the picture is so horrible that it shouldn't be used at all until a free one is available and/or found and uploaded. Lhb1239 (talk) 23:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Denise Welch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Denise Welch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage nearly ruined

[edit]

Welch confessed that her marriage was nearly ruined because of her mental illness...

Which of her three marriages does this refer to? Valetude (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Denise_Welch&oldid=1249250160"