Talk:Disaster: Day of Crisis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Monolith Soft or Monolith[edit]

Is the game being made by Monolith Soft, the makers of Xenosaga, or Monolith, the makers of F.E.A.R.? Ace ofspade 20:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monolith Soft, the Xenosaga and Baten Kaitos folks. The Nintendo press release explicitly says so. Although the IGN page, at the moment the only source in the article mentioning Monolith, still says Monolith Productions, which is wrong. I'll see if I can find a source that gets it right. --Codemonkey 19:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tag[edit]

Why is the "first or second person" tag there? It really doesn't sound first of second person and the article is so small.

So, why the tag? If there is no answer then I will remove it, the talk page is here to discuss these things. 69.121.67.198 02:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's because Nintendo is publishing and codeveloping it, so it's first party Falco1029 03:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date[edit]

Surely a source needs to be provided for the claimed release date of March/April? Uber HW 18:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boxart and rating revealed?[edit]

This is taken from GameSpot (NOT GameStop) and it's a reliable source and a rating can be seen in the bottom.

[1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Borincano75 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC). magiciandude 00:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's unofficial. [2] --Blizzard777 15:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They are just puting that rating on the gamespot website because real world weponds are in the game. I highly doubt this NINTENDO game will be rated M.

It will, it was and it already is. Stop being so prejudiced. / 62.13.9.53 (talk) 04:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy up[edit]

I tidied up the page somewhat, and removed the currently unnecessary categories. There isn't a lot to go on as to when the game is due to be released, and the gameplay mechanics so i'm going to remove them. Fusionblue 20:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ESRB[edit]

On the official ESRB website, Disaster is not listed. Gamespot lists Day of Crisis as a Mature game. However, I can't find any other website that lists Disaster as a Mature title.

I think it would be best to go with ESRB and give it Rating Pending on this article. --68.41.78.45 17:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree. --Zooba 13:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research?[edit]

I take issue with the following statement:

"The game was created for the Wii as part of Monolith Soft's initiative to create new franchises for Nintendo."

Normally I would have added the tag that produced "citation needed". However, over the years there have been so-called "hard-core gamers" who have been dissatisfied with Nintendo's development decisions. That said, it's possible such a person may have made this up in order to bring the "facts" closer to this person's reality, and/or to this person's interpretation of what kind of games Nintendo should make: something that is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. For this reason, I have added the "or" tag. I could have deleted it completely, but in this case I think that "benefit of the doubt" applies here (if anything), so I decided to tag it instead.Brittany Ka (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

Famitsu gave a 34/40 score to this game, does anyone know what was said in the review? Wiilanadapter (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.gamegrep.com/reviews/13969-famitsu_reviews_disaster_day_of_crisis_gives_it_3440/ - My favourite is : "Yayoi Honda" 9/10 Learn a variety of actions, to carve one’s way to have fun. More than anything else, like how to throw hard in a very cool movie. Difficulty is a bit expensive, but we do have damage included.

Almost haiku-like.Mr T (Based) (talk) 22:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I presume that's a rough, machine translation? And yet still more accurate than GameSpot or Eurogamer's reviews. Seriously, what the hell game were /they/ playing? Is there a way to polish up that Engrish for inclusion? 76.221.140.211 (talk) 04:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also[edit]

I was thinking of putting Disaster Report in this article's 'See Also' section, for shameless fanboy pimping purposes as well as it being one of the few disaster games. However, there isn't a 'See Also' section, and adding it for just one game [series] would be silly. The only other disaster game I can think of was Bad Day L.A., but that was, to be fair, pants (but encylopedia's don't omit what people think of as rubbish). My point is, can anyone think of any more games of the 'disaster' genre? JaffaCakeLover (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot needs cleaning up[edit]

The plot summary appears to be far too large, and has some confusing prose at times: "he hasn't forgive himself for his death (because he blames himself)" and "seismologist expert" for starters. -- TRTX T / C 20:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disaster: Day of Crisis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Disaster:_Day_of_Crisis&oldid=1200233968"