Talk:Dragon Quest Builders 2

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Square Enix Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notes about Japan/Japanese support in PC version

This reference in the article page says DQB2 is the first PC installment of the DQ games that can be bought from Japan and supports Japanese. In fact, it's not accurate enough.

First, note that Steam versions of Dragon Quest Heroes 1, Heroes 2, and XI were published prior to Builders 2. The points are:

Dragon Quest Heroes 1 and 2 do have Japanese voices. However the Japanese UIs and subtitles of the console versions were dropped.
Heroes 1 can be bought from Japan.

So put correctly, DQB2 is the first that retains the full Japanese environment, and at the same time, that can be purchased from Japan. In jargon, DQB2 is completely "omakuni"-free.

These points can be confirmed from this page I wrote, but it does not meet the criteria of Wikipedia's reliable sources. :P (It's not CC BY-SA nor GFDL.) I don't think there exists any "good" source that describes the above points correctly, so probably there's nothing we can do. --D9w.hatena (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It does not even seem that notable to me anyway, and since the claim is wrong/dubious, I think we should just remove it for now. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]