Talk:Eleanor Norcross
Appearance
![]() | Eleanor Norcross has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 19, 2017, June 24, 2020, October 19, 2022, and October 19, 2023. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Eleanor Norcross/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 17:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this one within the next 7 days. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Great, thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- WikiProjects
- I added a couple of pertinent WikiProjects.
- Excellent, thank you!--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Images
- Image captions: Massachusetts can be removed from "Tapestry, oil on canvas, Fitchburg Art Museum, Massachusetts" as the preceding image mentions the state.
- Good point. Done.--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Number of images in comparison to amount of prose - Seems disproportionate. I recognize that articles about artists should contain representative samples of their work, but I'm wondering if one or more of the images could be removed, for example, "Still Life with Parrot, oil on canvas", which is not mentioned within the article itself?
- Yep, that would be the one I'd choose, too. I removed it.--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
More later. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi @Rosiestep:, do you have anything else for the review? Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Second set
[edit]- Early life
- "50 miles" - I suggest using the measurement template for those who understand other measurements better: 50 miles (80 km)
- Style and paintings
- Can the one-sentence paragraph be merged with another paragraph?
- Museum
- "twentieth century" - change to "20th century" as numerals for centuries have been used earlier in the article.
- "The works of art—which includes" - change to "include"
- Death
- "She" - change to Norcross
- Notes
- "She was raised in two houses on Fitchburg's Main Street, one no longer stands and the other is on upper Main Street, across from Upper Common" - Either split this into 2 sentences, or use a semi-colon after Street.
- Made 2 sentences.
Done--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Made 2 sentences.
- "According to Edouard Villard may have influenced Norcross's interiors, according to Traute M. Marshall, author of Art Museums Plus." - I'm not quite sure what this is saying. Maybe the sentence should omit the first two words?
- Yep, I reworded the sentence, but forgot to remove the extra "according to". thanks!
Done--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yep, I reworded the sentence, but forgot to remove the extra "according to". thanks!
- If Edouard Villard refers to Édouard Vuillard, add wl.
- "The museum is also reported to have founded in 1925" - ... have been founded ...
- References
- 1 January 2005 - switch to January 1, 2005 to match style used throughout this section
- Categories
- Consider adding some cats regarding collector and philanthropist; also Category:People from Fitchburg, Massachusetts, Category:Deaths from kidney failure, and Category:American Impressionist painters.
Done - I used "Deaths from renal failure", which was the redirect from "Deaths from kidney failure". Good additions!--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
@CaroleHenson: Nicely done. Please ping me when you're ready for me to take a final read. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- Great catches! Thanks, @Rosiestep:!--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep:, Excellent, thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Women artists articles
- WikiProject Women artists articles
- GA-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Massachusetts articles
- Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject United States articles