Talk:Eleventh emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eleventh emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Eleventh emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Eleventh emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
untitled
[edit]Intro should clarify that this is a non-binding resolution. 188.27.42.181 (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Exactly! The results are non-binding. I mean the same UN has annually condemned the US-Cuban embargo with only the US and Israel voting against sometimes as well, but that too is non-binding. CaribDigita (talk) 14:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Intro change asked for this article (reformatted to meet article talk page requirements)
[edit]Intro should clarify that this is a non-binding resolution. 188.27.42.181 (talk)
- The resolution was passed by the Security Council because
... if the Security Council, because of lack of unanimity of the permanent members, fails to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security in any case where there appears to be a threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression, the General Assembly shall consider the matter immediately with a view to making appropriate recommendations to Members for collective measures, including in the case of a breach of the peace or act of aggression the use of armed force when necessary, to maintain or restore international peace and security. If not in session at the time, the General Assembly may meet in emergency special session within twenty-four hours of the request therefor. Such emergency special session shall be called if requested by the Security Council on the vote of any seven members, or by a majority of the Members of the United Nations...
. - This allowed the General Assembly to vote on and pass a resolution. The resolution passed but did not authorize armed force. Putin has raised the specter of nuclear weapons. NATO and the rest of the world are trying to avoid that by moving carefully.
- See United Nations Security Council veto power#Criticism
- The commentary I've read leads me to think the UN must use diplomacy—no matter what words in UN resolutions express, the member nations can not be compelled. It exercises force through a coalition of the willing, diplomacy, the power of the purse, and blocking the right to vote of members with dues payments in arrears.
- — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 11:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC) —
- It would be interesting to know what commentary you refer to. I wonder how this situation differs from that in the Balkans in the 1990s; also, whether the 11th session is still adjourned. Tony Holkham (Talk) 14:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I should have kept a list of sources. I will review my reading and reply.
- — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 19:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC) —
- It would be interesting to know what commentary you refer to. I wonder how this situation differs from that in the Balkans in the 1990s; also, whether the 11th session is still adjourned. Tony Holkham (Talk) 14:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- C-Class United Nations articles
- WikiProject United Nations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance C-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles
- C-Class Ukraine articles
- Low-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles