Talk:Endgame (Jensen books)

Balance

Nice article. It needs balance and context, relation to previous works by other authors, the school of thought it is from, the school of thought its critics are from, its critics and what they say about it. -- Stbalbach 15:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Pacifism

this paragraph is hard to read. its is very unclear what Jensen's position is on pacifism b/c the jumble of sentences goes back and forth between what he's refuting and what he's acknowledging. There are too many non-Jensen quotes here and quote-for-quote it is hard to understand whether jensen is agreeing or disagreeing. It would be better to state jensen's position first instead of stating his negative position b/c it makes jensen look like he doesn't have a certain opinion on pacifism, which shouldn't be the case given the heading of the paragraph. - hypomnemata nov.27th 2006, 12pm

This is the author speaking. That quote is deeply misleading. It makes it seem as though I agree with those comments. I was quoting all of those lines so that I could then debunk them for page after page. Could someone please delete this quote, or replace it with something that accurately represents my work. This was pretty clearly added by someone attempting to misrepresent what I actually say. Thank you. Derrick Jensen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.47.127 (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

I removed the quote. Tom Ruen (talk) 13:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Endgame-V1.jpg

Image:Endgame-V1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Endgame-V2.jpg

Image:Endgame-V2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I fixed both of them. Murderbike (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Endgame (Derrick Jensen books). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070630073637/http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/full_article/awards12292006/ to http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/full_article/awards12292006//

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:18, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Premise 16

I think that something should be said about the absurd search and excitement about finding extrasolar planets that resemble earth. It's completely delusional and a distraction - people think that we can colonize other planets. Why not focus on fixing this planet? I wonder how much money, time, resources, are spent on looking for planets around other stars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lehasa (talk • contribs) 19:58, 22 August 2018 (UTC)