This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Dilidor This is right up your alley. Check the history. Which edit is proper grammar? "he whom encountered" or "whom he encountered" or simply "he encountered".Oldperson (talk) 14:14, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Whom he encountered" is correct, which is what it now says. The "he whom" construction was in place previously due to my own typographical error on a previous edit, but my last edit corrected that. The "whom" is syntactically required by the sentence construction, as "the people he" is grammatically incorrect. Hope that clarifies. —Dilidor (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DilidorIt does clarify and thanks. As regards the edit you just reverted. I do not recall making that edit, not at all, nor do I see why I would have. There seems to be some glitches in the system, especially with edit conflicts. In fact I just received an ec when trying to post another comment before this. On an another article I made a 3 sentence comment on a talk page, but somehow in the process four editors comments were deleted. The whole affair was traced by an admin and it turns out to have been the result of an ec. I would not have reversed your edit above, the only thing I changed was "he whom" which you addressed.Oldperson (talk) 14:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What is a "mourning war"? Why does the number of hostages "suggest" that it was one? Why is this nonsense "thought to have been" what was practiced before colonists arrived? Those two sentences raised a host of questions and provided absolutely no information, and they are nothing but speculation in the first place. Listing some source for the speculations does not add anything of value to the article. That is why I removed it. —Dilidor (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that is very clear and I understand and agree. Perhaps if the edit summary had said as much. On the other hand I did learn something new.Oldperson (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
