Jump to content

Talk:Northwest Stadium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:FedExField)

Soccer

[edit]

Fed Ex field has hosted a few soccer games, but is the field FIFA compliant? Could the stadium host a WCQ or WC game if the USA bids for the 2018 WC? Nyrmetros 00:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This question is in play again as we head for 2024. Anyone have a source showing the length/width of the field when configured for soccer? 204.227.246.8 (talk) 13:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Stadium

[edit]

Are the Redskins seriously thinking about a new stadium when their current stadium is just 10 years old ??

Transit?

[edit]

Can you get to FedExField on the Washington Metro? --Jfruh (talk) 22:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't gone to a game, nor do I live in the DC area, but I believe you can take the Orange line to the stadium. The Landover Station is your exit.--BigMac1212 20:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The train doesn't go there, you have to take the bus to reach the stadium on Metro. Kcarlin 05:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You can take blue line to Morgan Boulevard and see the stadium from the street. Not quite a mile's walk to FedEx. http://www.wmata.com/rail/station_detail.cfm?station_id=110 Rufwork (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No Metrorail service there. There's PLENTY of parking for everyone, though ChaseS08 (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

[edit]
  1. "The stadium's record occupancy was in 2002 with 75,000 tickets sold holding the highest record in the history of the stadium."
  2. "FedExField has not had a football season in which the stadium failed to sell out its tickets" - the stadium holds 90,000

One these statements must be wrong, but I know don't know which. Tompw (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looked but did not find an authoritative source yet, but: The stadium opened seating approximately 80,000, with some of that being luxury boxes and whatnot which are not sold as tickets per se. In 2004 Dan Snyder put in more seats (and introduced obstructed view seating where Jack Kent Cooke had permitted none) to raise the total to approximately 91,000. The record set in 2002 was, of course, surpassed once the capacity was increased. Kcarlin 05:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first one must be wrong. If you check the external links, the Redskins had over 700,000 in attendence for a 8-game home schedule. That means they average about 90,000 per game, a figure that makes "record occupancy" of 75,000 seem silly. I am going to go ahead and delete that sentence.--Hawflake 12:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I am confused as to how the team can consistently sell out, but the record attendance (according to the article) is 90,588 for a Redskins game and 91,665 for a college game, when the stadium seats 91,704 (a larger figure than either). How can you sell out and be under capacity?76.10.24.245 03:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sell outs are paid attendance, strictly tickets sold. Game day attendance is fannies in the seats, who showed up to use the ticket. Kcarlin 04:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on FedExField. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on FedExField. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms and potential replacement?

[edit]

Hi, there's no mention of the potential replacement in that section. Could someone update it to include the talk of a new stadium and where it'll be built? (near RFK?) 2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:5560:1889:FD95:84E (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)ES2602:306:CD9B:E9A0:5560:1889:FD95:84E (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FedExField. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on FedExField. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FedExField. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the wearing of Washington REDSKINS merchandise in Fed Ex Field allowed? REDSKINS fans want to know🤔!

[edit]

? 64.150.138.102 (talk) 21:11, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No headdresses or face paint, https://www.commanders.com/stadium/stadium-guide. It doesn't mention anything about jerseys, hats, jackets etc.

Roberto221 (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]