Jump to content

Talk:Film industry in Georgia (U.S. state)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Film industry in Georgia (U.S. state). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 November 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Clear consensus that this is needed to distinguish state and country — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Film industry in GeorgiaFilm industry in Georgia (U.S. state) – Consistency with main article's title Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Oppose recent move

[edit]

For the record, I wish to note my Oppose to the recent move just above and request to be notified if a new RM is filed accordingly. While I recognize the ambiguity between the country and state named Georgia, of course, there is no ambiguity with Film industry in Georgia, which at least continues to correctly redirect as WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to the now unnecessarily disambiguated Film industry in Georgia (U.S. state). In general, whenever a more concise title is a primary redirect to a less concise title, that's a good indicator we have unnecessary disambiguation. It's definitely unnecessary disambiguation in this case because the film industry in the country Georgia does not warrant its own article. If it did, that would be a different matter. In the same way, we have The Paris News, not The Paris (Texas) News. Now, if media in France also creates a The Paris News, then we would reconsider the title we use for the one in Paris, Texas. But for now, we leave it as is. The same reasoning applies to the title of this article. Furthermore, the new title is confusing: Film industry in Georgia is not a "U.S. state". It really should be moved back as soon as possible because it sets a confusing precedent. I won't open an RM right away, but am pinging the participants to see if there is consensus to reconsider. Folks, what do you think? @MSGJ:, @Mvcg66b3r:, @Anthony Appleyard:, @Station1:, @Gonnym:, @Crouch, Swale:. --В²C 19:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Paris News is not the same since its a proper noun not a descriptive title, as noted the country has film industry to and there's no reason why an article couldn't be created on it, see WP:SHORTFORM and the example of Government of Georgia v Georgia in the American Revolution. Film industry in Georgia should be converted into a DAB which would make the unnecessarily disambiguation moot anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"there's no reason why an article couldn't be created on it". Please review WP:CRYSTAL. And if and when it is created, then we will have a disambiguation issue to resolve. But currently we don't, except thanks to the previous RM we now have an unnecessary disambiguation issue. --В²C 20:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is no requirement that an article currently exists (see Wikipedia:PRIMARYRED) as long as one currently could exist but in any case Cinema of Georgia (country) does exist. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind my disagreement with the reasoning at PRIMARYRED, it's irrelevant here, as it applies to red vs blue links on a dab page. There is no dab page involved in this discussion. --В²C 22:11, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I understand where you're coming from, but I do not agree. I stick with my earlier position. Gonnym (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's your right to be wrong. ;-) --В²C 20:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(responding to ping) Although I certainly agree with В²C that it was an unnecessary move that makes the title inconsistent with most titles that have "Georgia" or "Georgian" in them; or that start with "Film industry in..." (most of which refer to states or subnational areas); or that start with "Cinema of..." (most of which refer to nations); I don't think it's worth the trouble to reopen as long as the more concise titles continue to redirect to the longer titles. Station1 (talk) 01:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]