Talk:Fons Trompenaars

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The article about Fons Trompenaars model is very interesting and understandable. It is a well-structured and enlightening article that details the cultural differences. The seven dimensions clarify, that people from different countries have different attitudes and opinions about certain subjects. Also their behaviors and manners can be traced back to their home country where they came from.
Based on the seven stages I was able to pick out my own personality traits. But sometimes I tended to choose both possibilities, because in my opinion tends a behavior to be dependent on the situation I am in. For example the third dimension: In business life I tend to be neutral and in personal life emotional. And here I think is the problem with the method by Fons Trompenaars, especially because of the increasing mixture of cultures. People adapt and adopt behaviors. This is why I think that in the future more and more behaviors will be cultural mix together.
Some things I would edit are to bracket the countries on the first dimension so that they are internal linked to the other wikipedia pages. Someone should also write something about, where this model is used; management?, education?, social science?, marketing? I also miss some advantages and disadvantages of the model. And the 5th and 7th dimension, achievement vs. ascription and internal vs. external control, seem to me compared to the other dimensions not detailed enough.
But my overall impression is very positive. It is a well researched and written article and I might even suggest buying a book, which is listed under the books paragraph. --Den.geg (talk) 11:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of the subject is questioned

The subject of this entry is a consultant in a niche field. There is no indication that this person has met Wikipedia standards for notability. For example, there is no indication that he has received a well-known and significant award or honor or has been nominated for one several times. There no indication that the person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his specific field. Hence, the subject does not meet a single criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thus, this entry is nominated for deletion due to lack of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TippTopp (talk • contribs) 21:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the article appears to read like an advertisement for Trompenaars' consulting services. E. Klein, January 2, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.26.58 (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking in google scholar there is evidence of impact and his resume mentions awards, so he seems notable per WP:ACADEMIC, however the article looks like a WP:COATRACK for his model of culture with seven dimensions which is not notable enough for an article. It might deserve a mention and a real brief summery, but it might not. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 08:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article does not document that he meets the standard for notability but I suspect this is mainly because of the way it is written, rather than a lack of notability of the subject. His model and his books are widely used in culture courses and my recollection is that he has been mentioned in many articles. I suggest that instead of deleting this article it would be more appropriate to rewrite it. What I suggest is to add sourced material to address the notability issue, cut the description of the model to eliminate the coatrack problem and also add a section about the critiques of his model (well known to culture people but strangely absent here). I will check the public record and come back with more concrete proposals. --Andrew Hennigan 07:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewhennigan (talk • contribs)

I agree with Andrew that the subject is notable. His works are also cited in cross-cultural psychology, and although he's more active in Europe than the US, he's definitely a major player in the field. Shandong44 (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A quick check on Google Scholar shows that there are more than 5000 citations for his book "Riding the Waves of Culture" and more than 2500 other publications that refer to his work. I will pick out some of these references to use in this page. Andrew Hennigan (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fons Trompenaars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214191520/http://www.thinkers50.com/results/2011 to http://www.thinkers50.com/results/2011

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

This is an autobiography. 2A00:23C7:9985:1701:D4A8:F57D:7CBF:C886 (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]