Talk:Frank Chester (politician)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Manitoba / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manitoba.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Page move

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I'm not convinced that the politician is overwhelmingly better known than the umpire, Frank Chester (umpire). I think this page should be at something like Frank Leslie Chester or Frank Chester (politician) and the disambiguation page Frank Chester (disambiguation) moved here. -- Ferma (talk) 17:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. --Dweller (talk) 21:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. extra999 (talk) 14:21, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed x 3 (and adopted the article into WPCanada). PK T(alk) 18:00, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. I posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket yesterday, and at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography and Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board today, so perhaps worth waiting a few days for more input. I guess there is no rush, but this does not look controversial: can an admin just do this, or is there some procedure that must be followed? -- Ferma (talk) 17:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the nature of the moves, an admin will be required (both Dweller and myself are admins, though), but we shouldn't need to go through the more formal requested moves process unless there are some objections. If no one opposes in the next day or so I'll be happy to perform the moves. Jenks24 (talk) 17:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support move. Page view statistics seem to indicate that neither article is viewed often, averaging no more than 3-6 hits per day. Neither warrants the plain title per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Mind matrix 19:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support move. Neither one has a particularly strong claim of primary topic over the other one, and indeed the only reason this article actually has the plain title is that it was created in 2005 while the umpire didn't have an article until 2006. I'll note that while the "Frank Leslie Chester" title is acceptable as a redirect, the main article title should be Frank Chester (politician) per our disambiguation guidelines, which generally recommend "common name + occupational disambiguator" rather than "obscure full name". I've already done a dabfix run to correct the links that were actually intended for the umpire and to swap the politician's links to the Frank Chester (politician) redirect instead of the plain title, so the move can just go ahead anytime. Bearcat (talk) 22:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.