Talk:Frank Prewitt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This biographical page was originally posted by Andregen8, who included promotional pages from a book authored by the subject, which I have removed.

My attempts to present a more balanced version of reality have been regularly undone by Andregen8.

As a result of my efforts, the promotional page has finally been removed with only a link remaining.

Andegen8 has characterized my efforts toward objectivity and assurance of a more neutral viewpoint on Talk pages authored by or contributed by him as being a product of an alleged "mental condition" and has termed my corrections to inaccuracies in his text as "cyberstalking."

I can't imagine that his behavior is appropriate under Wikipedia guidelines. Activist (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Activist[reply]

Activist: Thank you for your work with Wikipedia and making this article "fair." At the same time, we both know there are three stories: your perspective, my perspective, and what really happened, and so far, there is no conclusive evidence of one perspective over the other. As such, I find some of your edits slanderous and other community members have discussed this with me, agree. I will do what I must to remind you and the Wikipedia community of what is "fair." As to how we will agree on perspective, is one issue, but I will remind you, my perspective is shared as equally as yours. Let us do what we can to put the real story together. (Andregen8 (talk) 23:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC))[reply]

There was nothing "slanderous" about my well sources remarks. However, accusing me of being slanderous is in fact libelous. Ask Frank what he thinks. He's not much of an attorney, but he probably knows.

By the way, what did he think of his paroled boss and fellow board member at Allvest getting off on that sodomy charge in Florida?Activist (talk) 08:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Frank Prewitt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP policy[edit]

Wikipedia:Verifiability. This requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations. Activist (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The $30,000 "loan"[edit]

http://whatdoino-steve.blogspot.com/2015/04/steve-heimel-bill-weimar-joe-mckinnon.html AnonymousMonday, April 20, 2015 at 9:47:00 AM AKDT

"When Stockler finally did get to start his cross examination of Prewitt at 3:45pm, he lit right into him and then he began to try to show Anderson's behavior in a more positive light. First he hit Prewitt with a series of incidents that he suggested he could have gone to prison for. 1. A $30,000 loan Prewitt, while Commissioner of Corrections, got from Allvest another firm that subcontracted with the Department of Corrections (I think that's what he said.) Prewitt said he got the loan and paid it back. Stockler: Is there anything in writing? Isn't it true it was a bribe? Prewitt: No. Stockler: How did you pay it back? Prewitt: I worked for Allvest for four months - $7500 per month. Stockler: Did you pay taxes on the $30,000? Prewitt: No, it was a loan. Stockler: But you say you worked for it. Prewitt: No, I was paying him back. Stockler: So, all of us could avoid paying income taxes by having our employer loan us our pay before, and then we'd repay it by working and not have to pay taxes?" Activist (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]