Talk:Frog cake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Frog cake has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
September 28, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Australia / South Australia (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Frog cake is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (marked as Mid-importance).
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for other than editorial assistance.
WikiProject Food and drink (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Frog cake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for Good Article candidacy. Those things look so tasty! Check back soon for a review. I wonder if GA reviewers should make a rule that we must try the tasty treats as extra incentive for reviewing them... ;) CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Ahhhh, if only I could do the same thing without putting on a ton of pounds! :)
This article very easily passes the GA criteria. Although it is short, I understand that a ton of information will more than likely not be found on the subject, especially since it's only a food subject. I only ask for you to do one thing before this can pass.
"On the minus side, the success of the frog cake has led to imitations, so in 2001 Balfours registered both the name and the shape of the product as a trademark." - "On the minus side" is too POV-ish, I recommend that you correct that sentence. It really won't even take too long, and this article is on hold until this HUGE GIGANTIC ENORMOUS edit is done. ;) Send me a message on my talkpage when you finish! CarpetCrawler (talk) 00:51, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Done. It took a lot of work, but extensive research to fix the wording was the key. :) btw, I was wondering about the size too, so I checked some of the other food articles - in this case I figured that there wasn't really anything left to say. - Bilby (talk)
OK, the article can pass now... except you must give me 1,000 of those tasty looki... I mean, nevermind. The article has passed, great job! :) CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)