Talk:Gay liberation

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Sociology: Social Movements Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the social movements task force.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I did not vandalize the page when I "struck" through a section!

The paragraph that I deleted is utterly false. There was never a rebellion at Valle Crucis!!! Show me even a semblance of evidence for this event and I will apologize. Brad1002 06:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Brad[reply]

Well, the appropriate way to do that would have probably been to add a tag for a citation and discussing it on the talk page first. At the very least, be sure to mention on the talk page why you did it and give a bit of an account of why you think it's false. I think your edit was in good faith though. You might want to see Wikipedia:help for some useful info on contributing. I am not seeing any information on this online other than on wikipedia and it's mirrors either though. I'm going to remove it and if anyone can find a citation (which I doubt), we'll put it back in. Oh, and btw, never comment in the article itself, do that here on the talk page. Ungovernable Force^{Got something to say?} 07:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And SINCE 1971??????

Did the Gay liberation end in 1971 or what?

1969

This section contained the following remark: "In June of 1969, when a group of patrons of the Stonewall Inn (led by black and Hispanic transpeople)..." The parenthetical qualification is historically incorrect, and I have removed it. David Carter's excellently researched book on these events cites the eyewitness reports of both black and white sources who state clearly that while the Stonewall Inn had a racially mixed clientele, it was mostly white, with Latinos and blacks being a smaller percentage of the crowd. As a patron of the Stonewall I can verify that this was absolutely the case. Photos of the rioting crowds show racially mixed groups, but blacks are a minority. As noted in Carter's book, Duberman's earlier and less reliable book, and elsewhere, neither people in drag nor transsexuals were ever more than the tiniest fraction of the crowd. The Stonewall Inn was an illegal premises (it had no NY State liquor license) and it was located on a well-traveled street in the heart of Greenwich Village, having a steady patronage of drag queens would have brought an unwanted and dangerous degree of neighborhood attention.Jfpessoa 16:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the sources of information in this article?

What it says needs to be verified. Michael Glass (talk) 00:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ك —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.137.200.21 (talk) 23:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Entrapment

That's a pretty loaded term. I strongly suggest it be changed... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 14:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gay liberation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070503112345/http://www.camprehoboth.com/issue09_14_07/past_out.htm to http://www.camprehoboth.com/issue09_14_07/past_out.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where do the references come from?

Some of the references for this article are mysterious. Three of the references are apparently letters but there is no information about if/where these are published. There is also a 'HarperOne' reference and a 'Hansen' reference - I have no idea what these refer to. These are almost the only references for the entire Vanguard section, so they need to be fixed or the section removed. Leschnei (talk) 00:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gay liberation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gay liberation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tangentgroup.org/history/Timeline/Timeline1961.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tangentgroup.org/history/BlackCat.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150222025202/http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/gay_liberation_front.html to http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/gay_liberation_front.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gay liberation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090818215839/http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2007/1/2007_1_10.shtml to http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/2007/1/2007_1_10.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please help clean up this mess of an article

The content under 1960s, particularly the 1969 section, is a confusing mish-mash of dates, names and places. I realize different writers contribute to articles, but part of editing a section is making sure whatever you add dovetails with rest of article. Geesh. It's getting late, I'm getting cranky, so I'll take a break and return to this entry later. Meantime, any queens wanna collaborate on cleaning up this mess? Lemme know. Ugh. Kinkyturnip (talk) 07:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]