Jump to content

Talk:Germany's Aims in the First World War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tagged for deletion

[edit]

no need for this article. the subject is covered in more detail in Fritz Fischer article. Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a paragraph in the Fischer article. I have expanded this article a little  Francium12  00:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • this is just a book review, and a cursory one at that. How about subsuming this, and other material, and writing a real article (not a stub) on the Fischer controversy, which is why this book is notable. Rename the article "Fischer controversy" etc. Wikipedia needs an article, not just a paragraph, on it. To rate this present article as "start" is generous. It barely scratches the surface of why this book is notable, and even though it directs readers elsewhere, the direction doesn't really cover the topic. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • In terms of world war I origins historiography this book is a canonical text, if not the canonical text. The idea that it is not notable is simply wrong. As Wikipedia has no deadline I will expand as and when. My personal preference would be to redirect Fischer thesis/controversy here. I'll add some balance soon as clearly there are many academics (and understandably many Germans) who don't take to Fischer's views.  Francium12  20:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • that's fine, but I still think you should call it Fischer Thesis, or Fischer Controversy. As it stands, it looks like an article about German's goals in WWI, rather than a book about a scholar's (and his followers') interpretation of Germany's goals in WWI, and it is also a book that is seriously controversial, when it was published in German in 1961, translated into English in 1967, and now. As for it being a canonical text, we could argue until the cows come home on that one. Yes, it is an important text, but there are many others. For example, The making of the English working class, by E.P. Thompson, is also a "canonical" text. Does this mean it warrants an encyclopedia article? Or does this mean that it should instead be part of a larger article on Historiography of the Industrial Revolution? Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Germany's Aims in the First World War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Germany%27s_Aims_in_the_First_World_War&oldid=1213796291"