Talk:Gerta Keller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Notability[edit]

I restored this article because I'm quite certain that this person is notable enough for an article. Please give me and others a little time to work this out, thanks! --JoanneB 20:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

You should remove this. It's just another vanity page for a non-notable scientitian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.34.234.247 (talkcontribs)

You have to love when a true expert can discern that this "scientitian" is not notable. Alansohn (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

remove this noobs page. gerta is just another wannabe getting in the way of big science. lets flush this turd down the toilet back into the obscurity she deserves —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.77.51.31 (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

That your one and only contribution (unsigned IP!) bothers with Gerta Keller proves that she is notable enough. It is true there is a Science review of the Alvarez hypothesis: Schulte, Peter (5 March 2010). "The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous- Paleogene Boundary". Science. 327 (5970): 1214–1218. doi:10.1126/science.1177265. Retrieved 2010-03-08.  Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)). But the review did not tell anything new and the coupling of sulfur dioxide emissions, flood basalts and extinction events seems quite clear too, the whole story is not uncovered yet: