Talk:Gex (series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gex (series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Gex" series – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Probable Citogenesis towards 15 Million Units Sales Number

Right now this page includes "The Gex series has sold a total of over 15 million copies for all platforms" with this article as it's source, meanwhile I have reason to believe this is a case of citogenesis.

Timeline as I understand it:

- January 26 2010 on this page, a user contributes an unsubstantiated "15 million copies" sales claim without a citation.

- June 23 2011 PlayStation Universe writes an article about Gex, and includes this 15 million copies sales claim also without a source.

- September 26 2015 on this page, a user notices the lack of citation on the 15 million copies sales claim, and adds the Playstation Universe article as the citation for the claim

--

If anyone can find a reputable source for this claim (from a reliable source, or from before January 26th 2010), that would be useful, because otherwise it seems like this piece of information is baseless. In pink ink (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As of today I removed the claim from the page. In pink ink (talk) 01:59, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the removal. It might have been based on the unreliable VGChartz estimates. A VG247 opinion piece also cites that number, but sales should use a business writer source. IgelRM (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]