Talk:Grievance (labour)

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Grievance was copied or moved into Grievance (labour) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Robcacciola.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CSB bot got it wrong

this bot edit [1] was wrong, the site is a wiki mirror.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grievance procedures

they dont necessarily involve trade unions--Penbat (talk) 16:01, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Edits

Expanded the stub to include new subheadings/information. Feel free to add on or edit where needed.Robcacciola (talk) 22:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) samee converse 20:10, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grievance (labour) → Grievance – Clearly the primary topic for the term. There's also a lot of overlap too. I don't know where the current article at Grievance should go, though. wumbolo ^^^ 22:25, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - not primary. Grievance would be the perfect place to expand into a CONCEPTDAB though. -- Netoholic @ 23:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Page views tend to indicate it is primary. The current article is little more than a WP:DICDEF (and even the wiktionary link was wrong) and can be safely overwritten (or would that need a PROD?). ~~There are about seventy incoming links, but many need retargeting anyway.~~ 62.165.227.102 (talk) 23:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've retargeted around 42 links in articles from grievance to grievance (labour) per MOS:SPECIFICLINK, when the context was clearly that use (especially as "filed a grievance"). I also retargeted a couple to grievance redressal, but there are 32 left where the meaning is more general (or a specific religious meaning). 62.165.227.102 (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I not convinced that this is the primary topic. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If there is no primary topic, then Grievance (disambiguation) should be moved over Grievance, per WP:DABPAGENAME. I see no value in keeping the current article. 62.165.227.102 (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per WP:DABCONCEPT while the current article isn't great, it looks like the place where the labour term derives from and can be explained in. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The concept of a grievance is the same as the concept of a complaint, but that article isn't a WP:CONCEPTDAB. Should it redirect to Grievance? wumbolo ^^^ 19:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't a grievance in the context of labour a case where someone has a complaint but feels grievance about the situation, while the term "grievance" can be broader to refer to frustration, for example something that someone is frustrated about but clearly they can't file a complaint about, such as the weather. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not the primary topic at all. The primary topic is simply something that causes grief. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.