Talk:HMCS Integrity (1804)

HMCS Integrity (1804) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 14, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from HMCS Integrity (1804) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that during construction, the hull of HCMS Integrity was filled with water to see if any leaked through the sides?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMCS Integrity (1804).

Wikipedia

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Australia: New South Wales / Military history / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal HMCS Integrity (1804) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

HMS or not?[edit]

Winfield does not list her in his book covering the Royal Navy between 1793 and 1817, suggesting that she was never commissioned, at least not as far as the Admiralty knew. However, it was not uncommon for local commanders on distant stations to commission vessels without informing the Admiralty. Colledge does mention her, and he states that she was still listed as late as 1810; apparently he was unaware of her loss. The National Maritime Museum in Greenwich lists her as beeing bought or built in 1805, and gives the name of her master in 1806 as A. Bloodsworth. In any case, she was not the only HMS Integrity. Acad Ronin (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree she was not formally commissioned - Lyon's "Sailing Navy List" specifically states she was an unregistered vessel. No great surprise given her small size and the remoteness of New South Wales. I've noted her status as an unregistered RN vessel in the article, but as discussed in more detail at WT:SHIPS I think a more accurate article name is HMCS Integrity (1804 ship). The primary sources (essentially Governor King's various items of correspondence) all refer to her as "HM Colonial Cutter" rather than just "HM Cutter" and as an unregistered craft she was never formally recorded as an HMS. -- Euryalus (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further, having now expanded the article to include each voyage it's clear that she only had two masters (Houstoun and Robbins) and sank in 1805, so the vessel commanded by A. Bloodsworth in 1806 must be another ship. -- Euryalus (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on HMS Integrity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]