Talk:Hannah Witton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Why does it mention her height?

Why does the Wikipedia article mention her height? Without a citation, I might add. She's not a basketball player, it doesn't matter. I'm not going to remove it, but it seems inappropriate. Fluoborate (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fluoborate: Remove it if you hate it, I spent my ammo against "weight"/"mass" on Sasha Grey+d:Q2709, and anybody trying "cup size" on (don't say) without a Guardian reference is dead. At least "height" is no moving target, but still requires a solid reference.
Unrelated, this article needs an image, e.g., a cropped frame extracted from the added video. –84.46.52.142 (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– by direct action after some meep tried to add a "mass" on d:Q2709 again. –84.46.52.63 (talk) 10:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CoI

Personally I hate religious categories; maybe because I'm from Germany: The next step after tagging people could be to "collect" those you don't like. Therefore I agree with this edit, but she explicitly mentioned it as (quote) secular (unquote) in a self-published "assumptions" video yesterday.^[1] –84.46.53.29 (talk) 23:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Something else in need of a 2nd opinion, please remove two obscure UK awards imported from dewiki if they are on the wrong side of NN spam. –84.46.52.223 (talk) 02:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– Got a 2nd opinion by Starklinson et al. –84.46.53.160 (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Book(s)

JFTR, Doing It: Let's Talk About Sex now exists and ends up here. When the 2nd book is published please get rid of the WP:TWITTER "announcement", it needs an ISBN and a redirect and (ideally) a review in RS. Or any primary source better than Twitter. –84.46.53.249 (talk) 06:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

– The 4th page in my search hits had a non-seller review, skipping a Chloe Metzger review as WP:UGC. –84.46.52.63 (talk) 14:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Hormone Diaries: The Bloody Truth About Our Periods now also ends up here. –84.46.52.79 (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoy watching people clean but not watching someone flaunt their body

She's taking advantage of using her sexuality to try to get viewers 71.50.213.193 (talk) 00:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English-German YouTuber?

Is it notable enough to add the fact she took German citizenship to the top line of her bio alongside English? While it is a fact worth including in the main article, she is not anything more than administratively German who took a passport for ease of travel and to connect with her ancestors. She doesn't speak German and if you introduced her to someone you wouldn't say she was a German YouTuber which is what the Google bio box is being skewed towards now.

Not removing outright, just raising a suggestion. Ta. Greggykins (talk) 09:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could safely be removed from the intro. It is not like readers are going to understand much by it. Explaining it a little better in the body might be better. DanielRigal (talk) 13:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]