This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Comment: The term has received additional coverage, this time in both the New York Times and Bloomberg. Both devote space to the origin of the term, and the reason it has taken hold to describe the concept. I have added citations to both, and am re-submitting. This is the most common term for the largest challenge to three decades of antitrust law in the United States, and deserves its own term.
Comment: I have corrected the typo. Good catch. The use of the term in multiple speeches on the Senate Floor, in academic articles, in antitrust trade publications, and antitrust conferences would seem to convey it notability, no?
Comment: Simply being used by Orrin Hatch on the floor of the Senate is not sufficient. There's references that show the term being used, but almost no sourced content about the term itself in the article power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:08, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Unsure of notability. Editor has provided Media coverage from WP:RS, but what are the rules on notability vis-a-vis political terms/hashtags?If it were to be accepted, I think more information and background would be needed of examples of this within antitrust policy.Plus, Cory Booker's name is misspelled. Bkissin (talk) 18:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]