Talk:History of Dalmatia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Dalmatia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Croatia High‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Vanamonde93, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on January 2016. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: large sections of it are completely unsourced at this time. The language can be improved when the content has been made verifiable.

Editwarring

VVVladimir, if several different editors disagree with you, there is an obvious explanation which is much more likely than the notion that you are protecting the Truth against tag-teaming. Please stop. bobrayner (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I've been following this for the past three days and I don't see any explanation or discussion (and thus no consensus) for removal of such large portions of the article. Care to explain yourself? Shokatz (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, bobrayner, would you please explain to us why do you insist on removing those parts of the article, including several whole sections? They were deleted three days ago without explanation by a newly created account, and when the text was restored by an experienced editor, you undid his edit with the summery "not an improvement". So, how was the article improved by those deletions? Vladimir (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bob, I came this -><- close to blocking you now. This is simply improper, and you and everyone else editing in the WP:ARBMAC topic area should know better. This was plain censorship by what appears to be a disposable WP:SPA - reinstating those edits without so much as a useful edit summary is a clear violation of decorum. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Serenissima.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maps of Venetian Dalmatia

Please refrain from using 15-18th century and especially 15-17th century maps which are erroneously showing how Venice Republic had governorship and control over whole region of modern Dalmatia - it did NOT neither in its full extent of power which came in the 18th century. Especially not in the 15th and 16ht century, when most part of Dalmatia was under Ottoman Empire control and governorship, and prior to that under Hungarian Kingdom. Venetian Dalmatia mainly included only the very coastal part of Dalmatia with very near hinterland while the majority of the Dalmatian hinterland was not Venetian at all. Miki Filigranski (talk) 10:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]