Talk:Hotel Wolcott
Appearance
Hotel Wolcott has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 18, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Hotel Wolcott appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:37, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that six months after the Hotel Wolcott opened, its mortgage loan went into foreclosure? Source: "Strikes Force Bankruptcy". New-York Tribune. October 1, 1904. p. 2.
- ALT1: ... that the Hotel Wolcott had to be sold less than a year after it opened? Source: "Orders Hotel Sold". The New York Times. January 7, 1905. p. 1.
- ALT2: ... that the New York Yankees were once sold at the Hotel Wolcott? Source: Hotel Wolcott (PDF) (Report). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. December 20, 2011. pp. 5-6
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Controversy over secular education in New York Hasidic schools
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hotel Wolcott; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- 5x expansion is verified and I didn't find any close paraphrasing. I only checked ALT1 as I think it's the most interesting and usual hook provided. I don't have access to the sources so I will assume good faith. Just waiting on a QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Narutolovehinata5. I have now done a QPQ. Epicgenius (talk) 23:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies for the late reply but ALT1 is approved. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Narutolovehinata5. I have now done a QPQ. Epicgenius (talk) 23:46, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hotel Wolcott/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Happy to review this article. It may take me more than a week because I am traveling. Bruxton (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Bruxton, I appreciate it. And feel free to take your time. Epicgenius (talk) 13:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]good lead summary. All of the elements are cited in the body and the lead summarizes the article.
Grammar
[edit]- consider removing had from "42nd Street had contained brownstones"
- "and eastern elevations contain plain brick facades" consider "and eastern elevations have plain brick facades"
- "to the west (right) are a wood-and-glass door" consider "is"
- "The third through eighth stories contain a pink-brick facade" consider "have" a pink...
- "the two center bays of the Wolcott's facade has oriel windows" consider "have"
- "Near the center of the hotel, there were also a palm room to the left of the lobby" consider "was".
- "The ground story also contains a ballroom covering 3,500" consider has instead of contains
- "little chicken that come unplucked from the Jersey farms" does the quote say "come" or came?
- "the hotel become a shelter for homeless former prisoners" consider "became"
- I have done all of the above. Regarding the chicken quote, the original source says "come", as it was a contemporary brochure published from the time of the hotel's opening. Epicgenius (talk) 13:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Citations
[edit]- Site section citations check out,
- Architecture section cotations check out
- Facade citations check out
- Features sections checks out
- Public rooms section, I am having trouble confirming this citation for "The lobby ends at a checkout counter."
- The source says: "But the lobby ends abruptly with a modest check-in desk, which shuts off what was formerly an equally elaborate ballroom." I've fixed this. Epicgenius (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Guestrooms spot checked citations check out
- History the citations I can access check out AGF
- Development and opening citations check out
- 1900s to 1960s citations check out
- 1970s to present spot checked citations check out
- Critical reception Cannot access the citations AGF
Other
[edit]- I think per MOS:ORDER we need to move the portal bar below the navigation footer templates
- I have fixed this. Thanks for the review. Epicgenius (talk) 22:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Images
[edit]- Images are relevant and free
Review chart
[edit]100% reviewed
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Yes | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Yes | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Yes | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Yes | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Yes | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Yes | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Yes | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Yes | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Yes | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Yes | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Yes | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Yes | |
7. Overall assessment. | Good work! |
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- GA-Class Hotels articles
- Low-importance Hotels articles
- WikiProject Hotels articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles