Jump to content

Talk:Howard Creek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 5 January 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 14:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


WP:NOPRIMARY , there is no primary topic, the Colorado creek article is a substub and a more substantial amount of text about the Texas creek exists in its valley article -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Rivers has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Articles for creation has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was the AfC acceptor, and even I second guessed myself after accepting it when I realised the primary was a stub. Happy to move this. Qcne (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I concur KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 21:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Comment If this does go through, Howard Creek should instead be moved to Howard Creek, Colorado per WP:NATDIS. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, rivers typically use parentheses to distinguish from settlements which typically use comma disambiguation. See WP:NCPLACEDAB olderwiser 01:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.