Jump to content

Talk:Information security standards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Cyber-security standards are becoming more and more necessary as the digital age progresses. Someone who is more familiar with the ISO 27001 standard should expand this article when I get a chance; I'm actually participating in a workshop on this subject in a few weeks, so I'll see what I can bring back. [[User:Awillcox|Alan Thompermission to include an external link to Computerworld's Standards & Legal Issues Knowledge Center.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 May 2021 and 31 July 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dephiant08. Peer reviewers: Shayshay29.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Cyber" security?

[edit]

cyber security means security of cyber related hard/software —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.5.149.15 (talk) 08:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who on earth calls information security "cyber" security? Why isn't this renamed Information security standards. --194.100.12.194 23:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: Information security is more widespread.

As above - This article has re-hashed a number of InfoSec standards and declared them CyberSecurity. If Cyber-Security is related to CyberSpace and the Internet - a brief examination of the content of these documents will show little relevant content. User:loud-fat-bloke.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.2.94.177 (talk) 17:05, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Pastore Italy (talk) 07:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question - I'm not sure what distinction to draw between the terms. But note that one of the latest greatest frameworks from NIST is a "Cybersecurity Framework". ★NealMcB★ (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RFC 2196

[edit]

Why is the RFC 2196 often neglected in the security standard? It's a very pragmatic document often used in ISP world. Would it be worth to add it in this page? AlexandreDulaunoy (talk) 09:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. It was added at some point. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cyber security standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Cyber security standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Essentials

[edit]

Probably worth including as a UK government backed standard --Natet/c 14:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"cyber security" or "cybersecurity"?

[edit]

Should it be "cyber security" or "cybersecurity"? This article is currently inconsistent. --Mortense (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

demotion

[edit]

Its just a list of standards now. I removed tow "heading" items that were not really being used as such - and it wasn't clear that they were in fact valid. - Snori (talk) 03:54, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"cyber security" or "cybersecurity"?

[edit]

Hello about the name Cyber security or Cybersecurity .the name cyber refer to software using ,when we work on cyber we dial with software and program language.but when we let the the word cybersecurity that mean we give the correct terms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elrasheid44 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 October 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


IT security standards → Information security standards – This used to be titled "Cyber security standards" (see discussion above), then was boldly renamed to the current title per WP:AVOIDCYBER.

"Information security standards" is more commonly used than "IT security standards" per Google Ngram (WP:COMMONNAME), and would also be more consistent with the broader suite of articles on related topics like Information security, Information security audit, Information security management. DFlhb (talk) 21:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Information_security_standards&oldid=1201258677"