Talk:Insects as food

Insects High‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Food and drink Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Environment High‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture High‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Speedy keep, 16 November 2018, see discussion.
no consensus, 24 October 2018, see discussion.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because:

This is not a duplicate article:

Entomophagy describes the process of eating insects by humans (and animals), this is connected to certain cultural aspects, such as a certain country-specific cuisine, acceptance, taboo etc.
Edible insects (insects as food) in difference to that are certain insect species that can be used for human consumption, or processed into insect-based food products (insect burgers, insect bread, insect pasta). Example: A mealworm is an edible insect, a house cricket is an edible insect. They are food such as soy, minced meat, etc., have certain nutritional profiles, ways of production, legal framework (e.g.: cricket, mealworm and locust are authorized as food in Switzerland).

The first is a culture-related article, the second is an article based on nutritional science, food production and food law. For the first article you would search for scientific literature in the area of cultural studies, psychology, anthropology. For the latter you would search for scientific literature in the area of nutritional and food science, food technology, agricultural technology, etc.

To develop the whole topic under an article focused on the culture and process of eating insects is just misleading. We need a second article Insects as food (with Edible insects redirecting to it), just describing the food aspects (nutritional profile, farming/production, authorization). I started an article here, TheLongTone reverted my edits. This article should stay, both have to be developed seperated from another. --AlienFood (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I don't agree; both terms cover all the included issues, and have both been used indifferently for those purposes since the Second World War. Chiswick Chap (talk) 00:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to 'Edible insects'

Given the change in the article's focus, and its equation to 'Edible insects', it should be moved to that title. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We can discuss this. But I also want to highlight that the equivalent article on edible fish species is named Fish as food, so Insects as food fits that pattern. --AlienFood (talk) 09:58, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The mmuseumm artifact- Chirps.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2023 and 15 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EaglesEyes1 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Vansam823, Margaretbhanna.

— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard (talk) 03:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for allowing my contributions! Happy editing everyone, EaglesEyes1 (talk) 04:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

history off insects as food

there are many places where insects are eaten regular. like

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casu_martzu
https://www.wikihow.com/Cook-Tarantula-Spiders

the aborigini people dig up roots with catapilar larves. there is a lot off history with insects on our plate. Perhaps we got our first B12 from insects like wurm cq larves in fruits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.149.83.125 (talk) 12:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no criticism section?

No criticism section implying that everyone is happy to be eating mealworms. Also, what about labeling? Will all these insects be clearly named on the ingredients list? 79.166.3.165 (talk) 00:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People who don't want to eat mealworms should just.... not eat them??? Also, the FDA (and it's respective counterparts in other countries) require the accurate labeling of ingredients in their common or usual name; insects ingredients are legally required to be labeled and there is zero effort or move to change that :) 2601:648:8800:3B70:B044:EA15:8CAE:7147 (talk) 06:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With a focus on consumption of insects as an alternative to reduce climate change, it is worth discussing cultural aversion to it, especially if consumption of insects is predicted to be normalized on the same level as beef, fish, chicken, et cetera, or expected to become a potential replacement for these products. The aversion section is a good addition. 2A01:799:A56:9100:B52:ACC5:4B7:5298 (talk) 10:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The answer would be that no one has gotten around to it yet. I wouldn't say we specifically need a criticism section, but there is an empty section for aversion under challenges, which seems like the best place to add information about cultural taboos. Feel free to be bold whenever you feel you can improve a page. I'll look into what I can do myself here. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overwhelmingly Western focus

The very start of the article mentions 2 billion people depending on insects as a food source, and yet... does not seem to, at any point, discuss the insects those people consume, nor how they are prepared. There are sections on taste and food safety, but these likewise discuss exclusively insect species of Europe and North America (mostly outside Mexico, at that), not a single thought given to the insect species used to far greater success elsewhere in the Americas, Africa or Asia. If I had the knowledge and reference base to amend this I'd have gone editing myself, but as it stands this article reads less like an article on how humans use insects as food, and more as a several page long talk from a company invested in selling insects as food in the West specifically. 62.166.184.209 (talk) 05:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic "Number of edible insect species per country"

The map is very wrong. Just for example: There are edible insects all over Europe, some are even mentioned in the article. I don't know what data was used to make it but there are so many issues with it, it should be removed. --217.240.192.86 (talk) 00:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protein ranking

A ranked list of what commonly eaten bugs have the most protein per calorie ratio, along with listing other relevant facts, would be helpful for those looking to make changes towards an alternative diet. 2601:681:5D03:4320:E8FF:8EBA:AD34:9326 (talk) 18:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]