Talk:J. T. White

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article J. T. White has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
August 8, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
Did You Know
WikiProject Biography / Sports and Games (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group.
WikiProject College football (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of College football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:J. T. White/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
    Title in cite 1 should be capitalized to match other cites.
    It is capitalized as per the source. Are you sure that is not correct? Usually, unless the source is all caps, I use the same as the source.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
    See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles. People, especially journalists, are getting very sloppy about capitalization in article titles. Keep it in mind for any other nominations you might have in progress, especially for FAC.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
    Thanks for the correction. I shutter to think of how many refs I should go back and change.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
    Yeah, but remember that it's not critical at GAR, but only definitely so at FAC.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    You can't find a picture, even a fair-use one?
Fair use photograph cropped from 1947 Michigan team photograph has been added. Cbl62 (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
  1. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: