Talk:Jamboard

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jamboard article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs more info

Article is objective, yet reads a bit with a marketing kind of tone: it's overly effusive. It is surely a stub and could really use some technical details. There is no mention of or comparison with competing products in the space, no user stories, no history of development, no criticisms. These things could be unknown, but I doubt it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgurtz (talk • contribs) 02:16, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Online Services section needs improvement

The Online Services section would need some improvement. The only source it references (and links to) is the Google Accounts landing page (for which you need to create an account to access), which is presumably going to not be accessible soon. This is could be a violation of Wikipedia:No original research as it is describing a product, although anyone who clicks on the link (before the services shutdowns at least) can pretty easily verify it. It would be better if it could link to a proper site reviewing the product.

I'm ambivalent in removing the source and adding Template:Unreferenced section as it still is technically a source? Floine (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it with {{third-party inline}}. It shouldn't be too difficult to find a source that supports the section's contents. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]