Talk:Jamia Hafsa

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This article is totally BIASED against the MADRESSA and it appears to be a PRO-MQM propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by InnocentMind (talk • contribs) 21:28, 24 April 2007

Jamia Hafsa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)[edit]

semi-protect. To stop Publishing of wrong information. Saiqa kanwal 15:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC) This article is out of date from current events, since this publication many events have transpired which demonstrate that the madrassa is politically aligned. Currently the madrassa is fenced off by Rangers and there is a stand-off with government forces. Lal Masjid has been fenced off by security forces after the rumors reported yesterday of suicide bombers. Meantime the government is stating that there will be no operation against Lal Masjid.[reply]

From Today's [1]Pakistan Daily Times:

President Musharraf said on Friday that the potential loss of human lives was preventing him from taking any action against the Lal Masjid, while adding that suicide bombers from Jaish-e-Mohammad were also hiding in the mosque.
“We are afraid of the baton-wielding madrassas who will stand by Lal Masjid if we launch action,” he said, while addressing the concluding ceremony of the National Media Workshop organised by the National Defence University. He said the female students of the Lal Masjid’s adjoining madrassa were “prepared for suicide attacks” and up to 500 children “were being used as human shields” to stop the government from contemplating any operation.
He said members of Jaish-e-Mohammad, a banned militant group linked to Al Qaeda, were also hiding in the mosque, adding that they were all capable of suicide attacks. “How can I take action?” he said. “Action is ready but will be taken at a right time.”
According to Aaj television, the President added that the government would take action against the Lal Masjid if the media guaranteed that it would not show any dead bodies in electronic or print media.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.14.32 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 30 June 2007

Original research/cleanup[edit]

A lot of what's here appears to be weasel-worded ("some say", "it is said", etc.), and basically an editorial. I think there's an article to be had here, but such an article needs to stick strictly to facts from reliable sources, and opinions need to be attributed to such a source, not just to "some say" or the like. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

had a general tidy up and added citation requests. ♥♪♫♥♪♫ 23:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link Removal[edit]

Removed Potentially Malicious Link:
hxxp://www.ishtiaqahmad.com/item_display.aspx?listing_id=198&listing_type=1
Possible HTTP 500 XSS Attempt (External Source)
http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3419079
(External Source) = IP 46.235.15.189 = MULTIPLE ENCODINGS WITHIN JAVASCRIPT OBFUSCATED DATA
See: http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=3419426 Gary Dee 10:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jamia Hafsa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080203085949/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk:80/default.asp?page=2007%5C04%5C07%5Cstory_7-4-2007_pg1_1 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\04\07\story_7-4-2007_pg1_1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Jamia Hafsa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Inside Library 1.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

JH New.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]