Talk:Jiji
Appearance
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 5 April 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Jiji per unanimous consensus. No such user (talk) 12:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Jiji (disambiguation) → Jiji – The page Jiji is a redirect to Jiji people, but that is not the clear main topic. The two "Jiji"-related pages with the largest traffic are 1999 Jiji earthquake and Jiji.ng, an online marketplace. See: traffic history (use pie chart view). I propose moving the disambig page directly to Jiji, which is a redirect now. Ich (talk) 08:32, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support – looks like no primary topic here. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support the group gets 125 views but the town (called just "Jiji) gets 129, its station gets 10 and the website gets 2,431. The 1st Google result is the company. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support I would close this but can't delete the redirect as a non-admin, so adding in my support for the proposal instead. SportingFlyer T·C 08:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nomination; Mx. Granger; Ortizesp; Crouch, Swale and SportingFlyer. There are ten entries listed upon the Jiji (disambiguation) page and the three-sentence stub for Jiji people does not meet standard for WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.