Talk:Jim Clifton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Is Clifton paranoid?

Clifton published an op-ed in the WSJ(??) in early February 2015 where he called the official government unemployment rate "the big lie." His point was essentially that the figure fails to capture the full picture of what he sees as a nation full of discouraged middle-class job seekers. (It's unclear why he chose to critique the rate at that moment, since the government wasn't using a new way of measuring the labor economy, except if he wanted to undercut Obama administration State of the Union claims about the recovery from the 2008 severe recession.)

Soon after writing this and having it amplified in a FOX News interview, he was quoted in various right-wing media to say that the rate was, after all, "actually extremely accurate." He then strongly implied that he was afraid for his life after having accused the government of lying.

I also notice that his personal life section on Wikipedia is a brief one sentence. I would think the CEO of the nation's most prominent polling organization would merit much more coverage. I wonder if someone scrubbed his bio for a reason, either real or imagined.

Any info available on this? Rousse (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He certainly does seem from those statements to be a conspiracy theorist, which is worrying for the CEO of an influential polling organization. 207.98.198.84 (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Worrying for some, reassuring for others. No personal stance, just think that balance is needed. Debresser (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing BLP sources?

This page was tagged in April 2015 as BLP requiring sources. In November 2018 I read this page and did not feel sources were lacking nor insubstantial. I would advocate removing the maintenance template as there are are currently 10 references for a 5k article, and every (very short) section has at least one reference. Although some sources include interested companies, there are also references from NYT, Forbes and US universities. I welcome comments Artemgy (talk) 19:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]