Talk:Jimmy Reid

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent death

I am a bit puzzled by a message concerning the "recent death" template. Is this based on some central decision about the use of this template, if so where is it? What counts as a significant increase in the number of edits? This article received 9 edits on August 19, not insignificant. Most seriously, we are told that there ought to be a signficant increase in the number of edits, but without an indication of what time this message was issued it is impossible to judge whether there has been a significant increase. PatGallacher (talk) 23:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Recency" applies for only seven days per Template:Recent death. WWGB (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per the instructions at {{recent death}}, the "template should only be used when many editors (perhaps a hundred or more) are editing the article on the same day". Eleven edits from six editors doesn't come close to the threshold articulated there. ^Bongo_matic 01:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an uncritical admirer of Reid, but given his iconic status I suggest that he deserves better than to be treated as Low importance in a number of projects. PatGallacher (talk) 23:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am an uncritical admirer of Reid (!), so I'm reluctant to make the change, but I'd suggest that the article probably meets the "mid" criteria for Organised Labour and for Scotland. "Low" for United Kingdom seems reasonable (though I'd be happy with "mid", too), but I can't find the UK's assessment page (The obvious page just seems to cover quality: stub, start, etc). You could maybe raise this at the talk pages of the relevant WikiProjects and see if there's consensus for a change or two? In the meantime, getting the article to C-class would be a useful goal, and might help show the respective WikiProjects just how important this article is. TFOWR 08:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have we managed to bring this up to C class? PatGallacher (talk) 17:49, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

pic

can we get a picture ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by St.PauliSocialist (talk • contribs) 18:45, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jimmy Reid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100915133042/http://www.gcu.ac.uk/archives/ucs/links.html to http://www.gcu.ac.uk/archives/ucs/links.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jimmy Reid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]