Talk:Jo Collins
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Johnpacklambert (talk · contribs) on 16 January 2020 with the comment: article lacks multiple sources that are reliable and indepdent enough to pass GNG. The acting roles do not seem to add up to notability It was contested by Miraclepine (talk · contribs) on 17 January 2020 with the comment: PPotMs are generally notable |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jo Collins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607034212/http://www.playboy.com/girls/playmates/directory/196412.html to http://www.playboy.com/girls/playmates/directory/196412.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
"Low-importance Pornography articles"
[edit]Just curious, why are articles about models who posed for innocuous figure-study-like photos back in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s stigmatized as pornography related? Lots of good writers published stories and articles in Playboy and lots of interesting and important people were interviewed in that magazine. Would anybody who picked up a random copy of Playboy from 1967 nowadays consider it to be "pornography"? Is this classification as pornography just good old fashioned American puritanism? Pascalulu88 (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Pornography articles
- Low-importance Pornography articles
- Start-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles