Talk:John Jameson (character)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Offscreen transformation
[edit]In Spider-Man (2017), when he experimented with a lunar crystal that turns him into the Man-Wolf, the transformation happens offscreen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:7640:E92D:FC5B:388C:E28B (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Jameson as a Pilot
[edit]I read on the Spider-man 2 DVD factoids(Spidey-Sense) that John Jmeson was once Captain America's Pilot. Wouldn't that be good to include?-Giant89 20:46, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Did he bring it?
[edit]I don't really believe that John Jameson brought the Symbiote to Earth in Spider-Man 3. If this is true, could you please tell me where you got the info?
67.160.13.149 10:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Darkton
- New comments at the bottom, and sign them with four tildes. Nothing more, nothing less. Anyway, the article clearly cites a source. If you won't take the time to look, why should anyone bother proving it to you? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 19:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry. I'm new here. Anyway I saw, and it's true. I also didn't see the source.
67.160.13.149 12:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Darkton.
Fair use rationale for Image:John jameson.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:John jameson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Manwolf3.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Manwolf3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Colonel Jupiter
[edit]I recently added the name he took in the Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon, Colonel Jupiter, but it got removed because it wasn't in the comics. This was suprising because Doomsday has Davis Bloome (his human altar ego in Smallville) as a notable alias. Is there some rule that allows one show's information to be acceptable over another? --William slattery (talk) 19:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Someone needs to add who created his other alter egos
[edit]Currently it isn't list who created his alter egos as Man-wolf, and Colonel Jupiter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluffyroll11 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 27 October 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
John Jameson (comics) → John Jameson (Marvel Comics character) – The current is against the normal naming convention for an article of a comic book character.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as proposed as over-dabbed, but I do support an alternate move. John Jameson (character) or John Jameson (Marvel Comics) are both sufficiently disambiguated and follow WP:NCC. There are no other fictional characters at John Jameson, so I lean towards using "character" as the first option in NCC, but I wouldnt oppose the publisher dab. -2pou (talk) 09:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Side note To editor NeoBatfreak: you don’t have to create a proposed move Target as a redirect before opening a move request. Not a problem to do so, but night save you a step. -2pou (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Move to John Jameson (character) per WP:NCCDAB. BegbertBiggs (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.