Talk:Joseph Antonio Emidy

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Brazil: History Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the History of Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Slavery

Why is the slavery panel here? I don't see why such prominence is given to this, when it is his musical ability which is the notable aspect which gives rise to this article.Leutha (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He wasn't a violinist when he was captured as a child and his enslavement was an important part of his history which you can't just ignore?Theroadislong (talk) 10:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit I do not understand why you reverted my edit, and replaced it with a contradictory statement and even went so far as to claim that my edit was "unhelpful". According to you he was born a slave - but where is the evidence - in fact latter on in the article it says he was captured by Portugese slave traders but you want to insist that he was a slave from birth. Further, it would seem redundant to suggest that he was born in early life. Your contention is not supported by the references.

Also I do not understand your suggestion that I would wish to ignore is enslavement. On the contrary, this was an element remained following my edit. What I question is the prominence of including the slavery box, a question to which you have failed to respond. Please look at Phillis Wheatley, Ukawsaw Gronniosaw, Ottobah Cugoano, Equiano, Scipio Africanus (slave), Francis Barber, John Brown (fugitive slave), John Edmonstone, Cesar Picton, Mary Prince, and Julius Soubise. None of them have the slavery box. I noticed however that on the George Africanus page it has been included, and indeed I have questioned that there. I could see an argument for inclusion for active abolitionists like Equiano and Cugoano, but I do notsee it as appropriate for all these people.

Also I must admit I found your whole tone disappointing and not what I would expect from an experienced Wikipedian. I hope you are not having a bad day.Leutha (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to your version, I think I must have misread it the first time! I don't see why we should remove the slavery section though which is quite helpful in getting a broader picture. Theroadislong (talk) 15:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the question is this, would have been just as notable if it were not known that he had been a slave? I have corrected the article as regards reference to abolition of slavery as only the slave trade was made illegal in 1807. Whilst he has gained particular attention from his experiences as a slave from a more contemporary public, I feel the inclusion of the box would be more appropriate if there was some evidence in having been active as an abolitionist. What I think is needed is a consistent use of the box focused on the lines I have outlined.Leutha (talk) 16:11, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Antonio Emidy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111224310/http://www.balh.co.uk/lhn/article.php?file=lhn-vol1iss83-6.xml to http://www.balh.co.uk/lhn/article.php?file=lhn-vol1iss83-6.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Antonio Emidy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130718155628/http://bishbashboshproductions.co.uk/work/the-tin-violin-2012/ to http://bishbashboshproductions.co.uk/work/the-tin-violin-2012/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External link: Official homepage

This link is broken. There is no clue to where it might now be. Best to delete? Ucypanp (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]