Jump to content

Talk:Judah Friedlander

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Why oh why is there an external link to MySpace? lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.225.26.83 (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

i totally agree. this article should be rewritten by at least someone who is not trying to sell me.

Was this article written by Judah Friedlander's agent? Twisket 06:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly does World Champion link here? --SVTCobra 01:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's been fixed. --SVTCobra 22:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Matthews video

[edit]

Wasn't he in a Dave Matthews video where he goes around hugging people? That's where I remember him first becoming really famous. --Howdybob 15:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That had been in the article, but someone edited out. I can't say why. Feeeshboy 03:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reverts

[edit]

I am again reverting the edits by Jeffrey O. Gustafson because they removed viable content for no apparent reason and also introduced some awkward wording and errors of language. Obviously, the article needed work to begin with, but perhaps if there is a particular problem with the way it is worded we can discuss it rather than continue reverting.

For one thing, I contend that schtick is far more appropriate than "comedy routine" in the third paragraph. The "World Champion" thing is a gimmick, an attitude, a source of humor but not a routine in and of itself. Furthermore, "schtick" implies a signature move or line, which "World Champion" certainly qualifies as: he writes it on his hats and tee-shirts (which I think he also sells). Feeeshboy 05:06, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There were huge (huge) problems with the language and tone of the article before I removed alot of the fluff and gibberish. It was written like a piece in Variety and that garbage will remain out ("introduction to showbiz" working as a soundman is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, for instance). I have put the word schtick back in, linking it. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 13:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, you really (really) didn't. If you refer to the edit history, I'm the one who took out most of the "puff" language, with the exception of "introduction to showbiz...", which is obviously informal and I'm happy to see go. Obviously I could have been "bolder", but I basically rewrote the entire article in order to address POV concerns and provide a few references. Clearly the article was far from perfect, but I don't appreciate your tone with respect to content I've worked on.
You took out "real life nerd", which is nonessential but I thought a harmless detail (interesting to note that, for example, he had a role for which he didn't dress as himself). You've also recreated a sentence fragment with "Although, his first exposure to many was as "The Hug Guy" ... ", which is one of the main reasons I was reverting. This article is not good enough yet to be worth arguing over the organization, although I felt it flowed better before your edits (although some aspects of the article are clearly improved). I can't revert a third time, and anyway, I need to review the bio manual of style before trying to improve the organization here.
"Schtick" was linked to begin with. If you'd followed the link, you might have seen why it was appropriate rather than hastily deciding that it was "puff" language. Feeeshboy 14:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Judah f.jpg

[edit]

Image:Judah f.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

filmography

[edit]

The numerous additions mentioning various screen roles are making this article disorganized, and many of these roles are not very noteworthy. If someone wants to create a filmography section, then that would be fine, but I'm taking out most of the unsourced, casual mentions. Feeeshboy (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His name is in the credits of the new Star Wars film... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.51.16.28 (talk) 21:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Judah Friedlander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Judah Friedlander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judah Friedlander. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Judah_Friedlander&oldid=1259741348"