Jump to content

Talk:Justin Hartley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Justin Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Justin Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

[edit]

The source used for a third marriage looked like classic synthesis: They've been seen out together, they've been spotted sporting rings on their ring fingers, we've been told by an unnamed source, ergo they must have got married. No actual proof of this conclusion was provided. BLP requires better sourcing for statements like this. Nthep (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after legal threats leading to a block, we still end up with a decent result. I guess the user's "legal team" will be stoked to have missed out on their fee for this one. Thanks for evaluating the source, @Nthep. ⁓ Pelagicmessages ) 02:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found this discussion after the marriage was removed from the infobox. If the information is unreliable then surely it shouldn't be in either the infobox or personal life section? CountessCobra (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Us Weekly should never be used for something like this. Even the original People article apparently does not confirm the marriage. The best that could be done with this is "It has been reported that..." but for BLP info like this, that is likely a poor way to go. Unless and until there is some follow-up reporting or social media posting confirming they are married, this needs to stay out of the article. --IJBall (contribstalk) 14:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
People does seem to confirm their marriage: Hartley was first linked to Pernas in June 2020, and they got married in May 2021. Also E Online: Days after E! News confirmed their marital status, Justin Harley and Sofia Pernas stepped out... and Entertainment Tonight Justin Hartley Shows His Love for 'Beautiful' Wife Sofia Pernas in Birthday Post, which references an Instagram post. Per WP:RSP, People is considered to be a reasonable source. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ohnoitsjamie: Thanks for that! That recent People source was just the kind of "confirmatory" source that I think we were looking for, as the original People source from several months ago wasn't conclusive on the question. --IJBall (contribstalk) 15:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]