Talk:KOKO Networks

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Africa: Kenya

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Kenya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kenya (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from KOKO Networks appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that KOKO Networks has used more than $100 million in carbon financing to subsidise cooking fuels in Kenya?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KOKO Networks.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Kenyan company KOKO Networks has used over $100 million in carbon financing to subsidise cooking fuels in the country? Source: Financial Times: "Koko Networks, launched in 2019, has used more than $100m in carbon finance over the past four years to subsidise clean energy cooking in Kenya"
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wright Mons & Template:Did you know nominations/Mamiko Tanaka
- Comment: I know the sources are sort of PR-laced, but I'd say Financial Times and Bloomberg are as good as sources get for companies

Created by Juxlos (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 214 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Juxlos (talk) 09:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Article is was recently expanded 5x, is long enough. Financial Times is reliable, although it's paywalled so I can't actually verify the hook. The article itself is well-written, well-cited, and presentable, and Earwig has no problems with it. Brindille1 (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]