Talk:Kassian Cephas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Kassian Cephas was a Art and architecture good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
August 29, 2010 Good article nominee Not listed
Did You Know

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kassian Cephas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 17:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article against the GA criteria. Sorry for the long delay; I know how you feel.

Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    A few problems to take care of:
    - "His photography business was not the only one established in the area during this time period." -> This is a little vague as to what it's trying to imply. Did he have competition? Was the photography business booming at the time?
    - "A blue velvet book covered with gold and diamonds covering the performance was presented as a gift on the occasion..." -> I'm assuming the book had Cephas work in it, but that's not very clear. I also think you should remove "covered with gold and diamonds" to make it more coherent.
    - I was bold and fixed a few other issues related to MoS and structure.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    - Are you able to provide quotes for your citations? It would be appreciated, but I'll take your word for your claims if you can't.
    - ISBNs for your final two book references are the same.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    - "This allowed the subjects to be photographed more quickly rather than having to remain still for several moments." -> I don't think details relating to his camera's shutter speed (aside from the shutter speed itself) is really relevant.
    - Final two sentences in "Personal life" seem irrelevant to Cephas, but seeing the lack of an article (or future article, for that matter) for them, I suppose it's fine.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    "Although both Cephas and his son were accomplished court photographers, Cephas was the most important of the two..." -> I'm unable to access the source, so this sounds a little non-neutral. Care to offer a quote?
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Arsonal is the sole major contributor, nothing else to say here.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images have expired copyrights and are in the public domain.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days to address or respond to these concerns. Strike out whenever they are complete. Feel free to ask any questions here, as I am watching the page. Regards. EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 19:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
    Failed due to failure to respond to concerns in the allotted time. Renominate when taken care of. EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 23:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)