Jump to content

Talk:Keli Goff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genealogy web site

[edit]

The term "original research" (OR) is used on Wikipedia to refer to material, such as facts, allegations, and ideas, without reliable, published sources. The source in question here is a website called Family Tree Legends, a genealogy program that allows users to submit their own information and information about their families. That's perfectly useful for genealogy enthusiasts, but it's not a published source. Now, the birthdate and middle name supplied by the genealogy program here might be accurate, but it's still not good enough as sourcing goes. Flyte35 (talk) 18:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i'm somewhat new to wikipedia so please forgive me but that website is used THROUGHOUT WIKIPEDIA as a reliable source and all dates of birth contained on there are 100% ACCURATE. i just want to know why you care so much and keep removing the accurate contribution (i.e. goff's dob) i added to the wikipedia article? please stop removing it and please get back to me, thanks. Bartholomew Bartolini (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

See above. Because it's original research. The fact that other people use it on Wikipedia doesn't mean it's an appropriate source, for the reasons I've explained above. I would remove something that cited a user-based genealogy program if I saw it on other pages as well (though I haven't). That's why I keep removing it. That's why I will continue to remove it until there's a reliable, published source. "Verifiability, not truth" is one of Wikipedia's core sourcing policies. Verifiability is a minimum requirement for inclusion of material.Flyte35 (talk) 13:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Keli Goff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]