Talk:Kemsing, Kent

Kent Mid‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Article Name

As Kemsing redirects to here should this article not be at Kemsing, if we have no other articles does it really need to have Kent added on the end when we have no need to disambiguate? MilborneOne (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Health

A section on health has been added an IP user 81.158.200.104 which is not really referenced and I removed as not notable to Kemsing but it has been added again by the IP, as the edit has been challenged it really needs to be discussed to show some evidence of relevance and notability to Kemsing if it is to be added again. The vauge reference is to a book on a study in the United States and South Africa, I would be interested to know what it actually says about the village as as far as I am aware it is not in the USA or South Africa. MilborneOne (talk) 22:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was page moved. There seems no point merging the talk pages. Andrewa (talk) 22:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kemsing, Kent → Kemsing — disambiguation is not required, Kemsing redirects here anyway. Crouch, Swale talk to me My contribs 19:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support No reason to disambiguate. Skinsmoke (talk) 04:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support (but probably requires a history merge or something to preserve the history of the page which is now a redirect).--Kotniski (talk) 12:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per proposer. MilborneOne (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Disambiguation is unnecessary. JinJian (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kemsing, Kent/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have attempted to put some shape to this article. First para = general location description, including facts about the parish as well as the village. Second = the village itself and its contents. Third = main roads + shops etc. Fourth = transport links. Fifth = AONB etc. Finally - opening for additional notes. Peter Shearan (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)